Designing the special pilot economic zone on peatlands

Ibnu Budiman, Rizky Januar, Willy Daeli, Rahmah D Hapsari, Eli NN Sari

Abstract


Peatland restoration projects in tropical countries could prevent environmental disasters such as peat fires. In Indonesia, one of peatland restoration activities is the revitalization of the livelihoods of communities around peatlands. Nevertheless, this activity is still lacking in reducing the environmental pressures from the communities on peatland. We aim to find a comprehensive strategy to design a sustainable bioeconomy on peatlands. This study draws on spatial, qualitative, and quantitative data from the literature, project and policy documents, open-source web application, observations from the field and meetings; and interviews with key stakeholders at national level and three Indonesian provinces. We found that an ecosystem-based special pilot economic zone (SPEZ) is a potential proposal that can provide a framework for a sustainable peatland bioeconomy. We suggests seven phases for planning and implementation of the SPEZ; 1. Preparing its spatial planning to support its legal aspects; 2. Field observation to derive biophysical information of the location and determining peatland suitability; 3. Identifying target group, paludiculture commodities and alternative livelihoods; 4. Analyzing the value chain, market demand and conducting a cost-benefit analysis; 5. Natural capital accounting; 6. Designing social innovation to trigger investment and market chain; and 7. Community engagement. From our study in Riau, South Sumatra, and Central Kalimantan, each of the phase present different challenges and opportunities especially in terms of regulation for land permit, institutional arrangement, market chain for peat products, remuneration of external benefits, and perception and capacity of community for cultivation on peat.

Keywords: Livelihood, peatland, paludiculture, special pilot economic zone, Indonesia.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7454/jglitrop.v4i1.73


Full Text:

1-23 (PDF)

References


Afiff, S. (2015). Learning from green enclosure practice in Indonesia: Katingan REDD+ case study project in Central Kalimantan. Chiang Mai, Thailand, BRICS Initiatives for Critical Agrarian Studies (BICAS), MOSAIC Research Project, Land Deal Politics Initiative (LDPI), RSCD Chiang Mai University, Transnational Institute.

Bastoni. (2019). Paludikultur dengan pendekatan agrosilvofishery: Capaian dan Pembelajarannya. Ekspose hasil riset aksi restorasi gambut, Kedeputian IV BRG RI. Jakarta.

Bonn, A., Reed, M. S., Evans, C. D., Joosten, H., Bain, C., Farmer, J., Emmer, I., Couwenberg, J., Moxey, A., Artz, R., Tanneberger, F., von Unger, M., Smyth, M.-A., & Birnie, D. (2014). Investing in nature: Developing ecosystem service markets for peatland restoration. Ecosystem Services, 9, 54–65.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.06.011

BPS. (2019). Sistem Informasi Rujukan Statistik. https://sirusa.bps.go.id/sirusa/

BRG, K. (2016). Rencana Strategis Badan Restorasi Gambut 2016-2020. 76.

Budiman, I. (2018). Enabling Community Participation for Social Innovation in the Energy Sector. Indonesian Journal of Energy, 1(2), 21–31

Budiman, I. (2019a). Mengapa Kebakaran Hutan dan Lahan Masih Sering Terjadi Meski Sudah Restorasi? https://almi.or.id/2019/09/19/mengapa-kebakaran-hutan-dan-lahan-masih-terjadi-meski-sudah-restorasi/

Budiman, I. (2019b). Risk governance on peatland management in South Sumatra. [In press].

Budiman, I., Sari, E. N., Januar, R., & Bastoni, B. (2020). Can compromised paludiculture manage its trade-offs for peatland restoration? [In press].

Carter, C., & Harding, A. (2010). Special economic zones in Asian market economies. Routledge.

CIFOR. (2014). Katingan Peatland Resoration and Conservation Project.

https://www.cifor.org/library/5278/

CIFOR. (2019). Luas Gambut Indonesia Terbesar Kedua di Dunia.

https://katadata.co.id/infografik/2019/04/29/luas-gambut-indonesia-terbesar-kedua-di-dunia

CIFOR. (2020). Scientists and communities in Indonesia team up for peatland restoration and fire prevention efforts. CIFOR Forests News.

https://forestsnews.cifor.org/63852/scientists-and-communities-in-indonesia-team-up-for-peatland-restoration-and-fire-prevention-efforts?fnl=en

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Daeli, W. (2020). Understanding Smallholders’ Mental Models of Peat Management and Fire Use Behavior in Riau. [In press].

Darusman, T. (2018). Katingan Mentaya Peat Restoration Project: 11.

http://katinganproject.com/

Douvere, F. (2008). The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management. Marine Policy, 32(5), 762–771.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.021

Farole, T., & Akinci, G. (2011). Special economic zones: Progress, emerging challenges, and future directions. The World Bank.

Giesen, W. (2013). Paludiculture: Sustainable alternatives on degraded peat land in Indonesia (revised draft). Quick Assessment and Nationwide Screening (QANS) of Peat and Lowland Resources and Action Planning for the Implementation of a National Lowland Strategy. (p. 71) [QANS Lowland Development.]. Euroconsult Mott MacDonald & Deltares. For: Bappenas & Ditjen Sumber Daya Air, PU, Government of Indonesia.

Giesen, Wim. (2015). Utilising non-timber forest products to conserve Indonesia’s peat swamp forests and reduce carbon emissions. Journal of Indonesian Natural History, 3(2), 11.

Giesen, Wim, & Nirmala, E. (2018). Tropical Peatland restoration report: The Indonesian case. Technical report. Project:(MCA-Indonesia funded) Berbak Green Prosperity.

Goib, B. K., Fitriani, N., Wicaksono, S. A., Yazid, M., & Adriani, D. (2019). Livelihood Revitalization in Peatlands: Woven Crafts From Purun As A Sustainable Business Option In Ogan Komering Ilir (OKI) Regency, South Sumatra. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 16(1), 67–87.

Hein, L., Bagstad, K., Edens, B., Obst, C., de Jong, R., & Lesschen, J. P. (2016). Defining ecosystem assets for natural capital accounting. PloS One, 11(11), e0164460.

Indriatmoko, Y., Atmadja, S., Utomo, N. A., Ekaputri, A. D., & Komalasari, M. (2014). Katingan peatland restoration and conservation project, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. In REDD+ on the ground: A case book of subnational initiatives across the globe. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia.

Januar, R. (2020). Sinergitas antar pemangku kepentingan di Kalimantan Tengah dalam konteks implementasi kebijakan restorasi gambut [In press].

Kartodihardjo, H. (2020, January 22). Omnibus law membahayakan lingkungan. Tempo. https://majalah.tempo.co/read/kolom/159504/omnibus-law-dan-kerusakan-lingkungan

Kartodihardjo, H., Mardiana, R., Yulian, B. E., Soetarto, E., & Baskoro, B. C. (2018). Analisis dan Strategi Penguatan kebijakan Pengelolaan Gambut. Tim PSA IPB.

KPRGSS. (2018). RTT Restorasi Gambut Sumatera Selatan. BRG.

Medrilzam, M., Dargusch, P., Herbohn, J., & Smith, C. (2014). The socio-ecological drivers of forest degradation in part of the tropical peatlands of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 87(2), 335–345.

https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpt033

Nobre, A. M., & Ferreira, J. G. (2009). Integration of ecosystem-based tools to support coastal zone management. Journal of Coastal Research, 1676–1680. JSTOR.

Nurlaili. (2019). InfoPublik-Desa Anjir Kalampan Jadi Kawasan Wisata Agroforestry dan Hortikultura. http://infopublik.id/kategori/nusantara/383567/desa-anjir-kalampan-jadi-kawasan-wisata-agroforestry-dan-hortikultura

Ostrom, E., Chang, C., Pennington, M., & Tarko, V. (2012). The Future of the Commons-Beyond Market Failure and Government Regulation (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2267381). Social Science Research Network.

https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2267381

Pantau Gambut (2018). Laporan Tahunan 2018. Retrieved December 12, 2018, from http://www.pantaugambut.id/

PRIMS. (2020). Restorasi gambut. BRG. http://prims.brg.go.id/dasbor

Silverman, D. (2015). Interpreting qualitative data. Sage.

Silvius, M., & Diemont, H. (2007). Peatlands, climate change, poverty, biofuels, pulp and reduced emissions from deforestation and degradation.

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.552.3571&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Tata, H. L. (2019). Mixed farming systems on peatlands in Jambi and Central Kalimantan provinces, Indonesia: Should they be described as paludiculture? Mires & Peat, 25.

Tata, Hesti Lestari, & Susmianto, A. (2016). Prospek paludikultur ekosistem gambut Indonesia. Forda Press.

UNCTAD. (2019). World Investment Report 2019-Special Economic Zones. World Investment Report, 80.

Van der Have, R. P., & Rubalcaba, L. (2016). Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy, 45(9), 1923–1935.

Warren, M., Hergoualc’h, K., Kauffman, J. B., Murdiyarso, D., & Kolka, R. (2017). An appraisal of Indonesia’s immense peat carbon stock using national peatland maps: Uncertainties and potential losses from conversion. Carbon Balance and Management, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-017-0080-2

World Bank. (2020). An economic analysis of the 2019 forest and land fires and haze. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/622281575920970133/pdf/Indonesia-Economic-Quarterly-Investing-in-People.pdf




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7454/jglitrop.v4i1.73

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats