Suitability location for inclusive high school in Bekasi City West Java Province based on school capacity

Galuh Izma Hasanah, Triarko Nurlambang, Faris Zulkarnain

Abstract


The development of inclusive education provider school must also be supported by the provision of good and optimal education facilities. In this study an evaluation was conducted on senior high school (SMA) located in three (3) sub-district areas in Bekasi City, namely Kecamatan Medan Satria, Kecamatan Jatiasih , and Kecamatan Bekasi Utara. These three areas were selected based on the percentage of the availability of the highest educational facilities in Bekasi. The Determination of location was chosen based on consideration through the site of school capacity variables based on the quantitative method. The results showed school characteristics can be seen as quality of the capacity for each school. In this study, it can be seen that schools can accommodate 1-7 study groups on average, the proportion of facilities and infrastructure for children with special needs reaches 55.5%. The research showed that the calculation of school's capacity resulted in 20% of total number of schools in suitable criteria, 27% of schools that were in moderately suitable criteria, 50% were in less suitable criteria, and only 3% of schools were in marginally suitable criteria

Keywords: School Capacity, Senior High School, Inclusive school


Full Text:

40-52 (PDF)

References


Amka (2017). Problems and challenges in the implementation of inclusive education in Indonesia. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 7(10), 159-167.

Ariastita, P.G. (2017). Strategi Penerapan Kota Kompak Berdasarkan Pola Urban Compactness di Kota Bekasi.

Cousins, J. (2005). Disabled children who need permanence: Barriers to placement. Adoption & Fostering, 29(3), 6-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/030857590502900303

Elsley, S. (2004). Children’s experience of public space. Children and Society, 18(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/chi.822

Hakim, L. (2016). Pemerataan akses pendidikan bagi rakyat sesuai dengan amanat Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. EduTech: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 2(1), 53–64. Retrieved from:

http://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/edutech/article/view/575

He, S.Y. & Giuliano, G. (2018). School choice: understanding the trade-off between travel distance and school quality. Transportation, 45, 1475-1498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9773-3

Lithari, E. & Roger, C. (2017). Care-less spaces and identity construction: transition to secondary school for disabled children. Children’s Geographies, 15(3), 259-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2016.1219021

Murdianto, M. & Jayadi, S. (2020). Discriminative stigma against inclusive students in vocational high school in Mataram, Indonesia. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(1), 614-622. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2016.1219021

Pearman, F.A. & Swain, W.A. (2017). School choice, gentrification, and the variable significance of racial stratification in urban neighborhoods. Sociology of Education,90(3), 213-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040717710494

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia (PERMENDIKNAS). 2008. Standar sarana dan prasarana untuk Sekolah Dasar Luar Biasa (SMA PENYELENGGARA PENDIDIKAN INKLUSIF), Sekolah Menengah Pertama Luar Biasa (SMPLB), dan Sekolah Menengah Atas Luar Biasa (SMALB). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional RI Nomor 33 Tahun 2008.

Thelin, M. & Niedomysl, T. (2015). The (ir)relevance of geography for school choice: Evidence from a Swedish choice experiment. Geoforum, 67, 110-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.11.003

Wibowo, S.B. & Muin, J.A. (2018). Inclusive education in Indonesia: Equality education Access for disabilities. The 1st International Conference on South East Asia Studies, KnE Social Sciences, 484-493. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i5.2351

Yoon, E., Lubienski, C., & Lee, J. (2017). The geography of school choice in a city with growing inequality: the case of Vancouver. Journal of Educational Policy, 33(2), 279-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1346203




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7454/jglitrop.v5i1.95

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats